Latest Movie :
Recent Movies

Natoker Moto

Cast: Paoli, Roopa Ganguly, Rajatava Dutta, Saswata Chatterjee, Bratya Basu, Sujan Mukherjee, Ushashie Chakraborty
Direction: Debesh Chattopadhyay
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 1 minute
Kheya's body is recovered from the Hooghly, leading to a series of protests by theatre lovers in Kolkata. Did the actress willingly jump off the launch while acting the part of a blind mother, was it murder or just another accident? Truth must be told. Calcutta Port Police begins a probe that throws light on the actress and her life on stage.

She died young. And sank without a trace from public memory. If not for Natoker Moto, Keya Chakraborty may have been carried away by a buoyant tide to anonymity. This was a distinct possibility. But like a mystery that she was in life, the lioness on stage, who met with a tragic ending, continues to haunt, even in death. Suddenly, she is everywhere. Two of this week's plays — Sher Afgaaner Tiner Talowar and Nandikar's Bhalomanush, based on Brecht's The Good Woman of Setzuan, where a young Sohini Sengupta led from the front — mentioned Keya in passing, during and before the performances. And then, there's a Friday throwback to the past.

Those not in the know, in March 1977 Keya, 34, a popular theatre actress, lost her life reportedly by drowning near Sankrail during the shoot of Swadesh Sarkar's Jeevan Jey Rokom. The circumstances were mysterious and the versions of eyewitnesses, bystanders and acquaintances varied. While that was the end of a young dream, it is the starting point of Debesh Chattopadhyay's film. And like in real life, Calcutta Port Police takes charge soon after. Through interactions with characters surrounding Kheya (Paoli), Bhobodulal Roy (Rajatava Dutta) pieces together events and in the process, uncovers facts piecemeal. What is unveiled is the journey of a lone woman and her fight for love. Kheya says her only love is theatre, though she falls for Prosad ( Saswata Chatterjee), her college senior, early in life. Their meeting scene at the football ground coupled with an ebullient song, Pasha pashi hete jete jete, is one of the best moments in the film.

Natoker Moto also touches upon Kheya's bonding with Amitesh (Bratya Basu), her mentor in the theatre group Notokar, Monoranjan (Sujan Mukherjee), her professor, and throws up a few pertinent questions on love and relationships. But beyond the physical manifestations of love — she cooks and cleans for Prosad, leaves her job when Amitesh suggests theatre needs full-time involvement and takes money unhesitatingly from Monoranjan for her mother's treatment — there is the call of the unrequited... Knowing well that theatre would take from her more than it would ever give, Kheya gives everything to it. Paoli internalizes Kheya and surrenders completely to what the role demands. Even in the in-film plays like Antigone, Noti Binodini, Proposal, she shines — like a star would from a distant horizon and another era. She shows her mettle even while singing Ami jokhon meye thaki, a fresh new composition by Debajyoti Mishra for Bhalomanush and leaves us wondering if Kheya and Keya are indeed one.

The scene based on Keya's own Mrs RP Sengupta, where tears wash away the letters of a poem the actress had started translating, signifies her longing to stay alone and fight a battle, her own. Debesh has based much of his film on the book he once edited: Keya, and other reference points available since the late '70s. But the film doesn't go beyond what's already there in the public domain — though it does bring back good old memories, with a bit of spite. It's strange when Prosad faces an unassuming Bhobodulal's queries right after her death. His answers drip with arrogance and sarcasm, and was he really crying just before the cremation?

Misplaced human emotions and lack of subtlety take a toll on the film in parts. But then, the director has mentioned that the film is a work of fiction and therefore taken creative liberties, though resemblances with real-life characters are too close to ignore. In the scenes where life transforms into the stage, the first-time director, who has a huge body of work in theatre, manages to freeze-frame important aspects of Kheya's life and highlight her pathos. Though many actors in bit roles are in character — Sujan particularly looks good — a few interactions are glaringly 'natoker moto'. Like the way, Kheya's mother (Roopa Ganguly) walks out on her after a heated exchange with her suspecting husband one night.

Indranil Mukherjee's camera effortlessly captures everything from the close-up of a face contorted with pain to the long shot of Kheya's mortal remains wrapped in a Murshidabadi silk floating downstream as Moushumi Bhowmik's Ami shunechhi sedin tumi plays in the backdrop. Then, there are important questions that have plagued group theatre time and again, as Amitesh puts it, "Dol-er jonyo theatre na, theatre-er jonyo dol". The depiction of '70s Kolkata is authentic, not the portrayal of every character who lived and breathed during that era. In the end, we come back to where it all began — did Kheya jump off willingly, was it someone else's doing or was it a stroke of tragedy? We'll never know. The truth is buried in her watery grave.
{[['']]}

Ek Nadir Galpo

Cast: Mithun Chakraborty, Shweta Basu Prasad, Jisshu Sengupta, Krishna Kishore Mukherjee, Nirmal Kumar, Anjan Srivastav and others
Direction: Late Samir Chanda
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 5 minutes

Story: It's a heartbreaking tale of a village postmaster, Darakeshwar (Mithun), who dedicates his sunset years to getting the Keleghai river named after his only daughter, Anjana (Shweta), after her sudden death.

Review: Ek Nadir Galpo is a visual masterpiece. The use of light, or the lack of it, to such spectacular effect creates an ultra-real template for the actors to add the dynamics. And they shine. Each character is as real as it gets, not one actor faltering or straying while portraying their simple village life and that touching emotional bonding.

Samir Chanda has truly lived up to his reputation as a meticulous art director, be it through his attention to the most trivial of details or through the play of light and shadow that leaves no room for any make-believe. From body language and mannerisms of the characters to their apparel, ornaments and even toys — everything is taken care of. Not one character is out of place, not one gesture loud or meaningless. The whole film seems to have been shot in natural light, though a few night scenes employ really subtle use of artificial lighting. For instance, a scene where Darakeshwar reads by the light of a lamp, or the next scene, in which he interacts with Anu in the light of two lamps. Though the light doesn't flicker as it should, the texture and the ambience are almost perfect. One can imagine the amount of thought that has gone into creating this poignant yet beautiful masterpiece.

Then, the twist that snatches happiness away not only from Darakeshwar, but the entire village — Anu's death — is sudden and unexpected. Nothing can be closer to reality than that suddenness — no warning, no telltale signs, just an abrupt turn of events. It's this masterstroke that shows Chanda's calibre as a director. He makes it quite difficult to separate cinema from reality. And it holds you, glued not only to your seat, but also to the screen, wondering what could possibly happen after the interval. What's left to happen?

A lot, trust me. For one, you get to see Mithun in, perhaps, one of his career's best performances. His world revolves around the river, which he starts considering his daughter, and making rounds of the district magistrate's (Krishna Kishore) office to get it renamed from Keleghai to Anjana. The way he portrays a broken man, going about life, stubbornly refusing to deal with reality, is very moving. The other actors, including, of course, Shweta, have put in fine performances too. Right from the simple village folk to the district magistrate, his seasoned personal assistant (AnjanSrivastav) to the police officer (Jisshu) investigating Anu's death, everyone has put in balanced, studied performances. Shweta, especially, has played her character of a bubbly, intelligent and outspoken village lass to the hilt. But it's the new perspective to the storyline that takes the cake. The second half sees the village taking a backseat and focus shifting to the investigation into Anu's death and Darakeshwar's relentless struggle to get the river named after her. And suddenly an emotional tale turns into a murder mystery, of course, without a hotshot sleuth, but a homegrown cop who refuses to give up despite hitting dead end after dead end. And Chanda has kept even this half as real as the first, never slipping when it comes to detail.

The background score, too, is subtle and understated, adding to the rustic reality of the visuals. And though there are just two songs in the film, one being a traditional number, the original song is a treat to listen to. And it takes nothing away from the visuals; rather, it adds to them.
{[['']]}

Anubrata Bhalo Acho?

Cast: Swastika Mukherjee, Ritwick Chakraborty, Debleena Dutta, Kharaj Mukherjee, Sumit Samaddar and others
Direction: Partha Sen
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 41 minutes

Story: Anubrata (Ritwick) confronts his nemesis, death, every day, as his wife, Neeta (Debleena), fights a losing battle with cancer. His life changes when his path crosses that of Jaya (Swastika), whose husband is fighting a lung ailment in hospital.

Review: Anubrata Bhalo Acho? is a mixed bag. On the one hand, it's a dull canvas that's coloured by sterling performances, and on the other, it's a painting ruined by a flawed sketch. The actors are a treat to watch — right from Debleena, who is extremely convincing as a cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy, Ritwick, who feels death hovering close and watches helplessly as his wife suffers, Swastika, who feels angry and lonely while tending to her ailing husband, to Sumit, who is constant complaining about the healthcare system.

In fact, the first half of the film is good — with Kharaj Mukherjee adding a dose of subtle humour as the pipe-smoking loner, Mr Lahiri. But despite emotions running amok and wonderful performances, some basic ingredients are strangely missing. While Sumit's character goes on and on about foot-long bills and how the hospital fleeces its patients, Anubrata seems blissfully above such mundane worries. He doesn't have a car, lives in a house that screams lower middle class, hasn't seen Mount Everest in his whole life, and yet, acts like he doesn't need to pay a penny for his wife's insanely expensive treatment process. He even refuses to take money from Jaya for purchasing her husband's medicines. And all this when Neeta is housed in an apparently premium cabin that includes life support equipment, including a ventilator!

Then comes the jolt called the second half. What looks like a healthy friendship between two lonely senior citizens suddenly turns into an amorous affair, with two 60-odd-year-olds making love on the floor! And bam, a good, almost sane storyline goes for a toss! True, both are lonely and depressed, but do such feelings drive two 60-something persons, who, had supposedly led loyal married lives till that moment, towards sex? Bizarre, and somewhat revolting. Suddenly, Anubrata and Jaya lose years and seem to become the age of the actors playing them. And speaking about age, another really baffling aspect of the whole film is the strange casting. Why have Ritwick, Swastika and Debleena been cast as characters a few decades older than them when there's no flashback in the entire film? They are old all through the film, except some blink-and-miss dream sequences. So, why choose young actors; aren't there older ones around? The plot gets more and more convoluted.

But the biggest question mark in the film hangs over Anubrata's character. He keeps waving away an imaginary fly, stays blissfully distant from all things mundane, falls head over heels for the first woman he gets acquainted with at the hospital and bombards her with text messages and phone calls, wears to hospital the same shirt he borrows after a night of wild lovemaking with his 'newfound' ladylove and drops insane questions on unsuspecting acquaintances. Is he really sane? He looks 60, acts like he's 40, dreams like he's 25, has no defined background and no friends — the only thing we know about him is that his wife loves the sea. That definitely makes Anubrata a really vague protagonist.

The background score by composer Mayukh Bhoumik, however, is not vague at all. He has really done well, creating a score that waxes, wanes, accelerates and slows down just like heartbeats, and emotions, do.

Watch Anubrata Bhalo Acho?, and witness actors putting in their best to salvage an otherwise bizarre storyline. And thankfully, they've at least managed to make the film watchable.
{[['']]}

Shesher Kobita

Cast: Rahul Bose, Konkona Sen Sharma, Swastika Mukherjee, Debdut Ghosh, Tulika Basu
Direction: Suman Mukhopadhyay
Genre: Romance
Duration: 2 hours 5 minutes

Story: The film is an adaptation of Rabindranath Tagore's iconic novel Shesher Kobita.

Review: When Rabindranath Tagore penned Shesher Kobita, he gave a new definition to love and longing. Down the years, readers have argued whether Amit and Labanya's love achieved fulfilment through separation and revelled over the how the author had taken self-criticism to another level. So, when Suman Mukhopadhyay decided to make a film on this literary classic and chose Konkona Sen Sharma and Rahul Bose as Labanya and Amit respectively, the choice gave rise to certain doubts. Could Rahul, with his slightly-accented Bengali, be 'The Amit Ray'? What if Konkona didn't capture Labanya's strength in simplicity? What if the poetic essence of the story got lost in translation?
But Suman's on-screen adaptation puts all these doubts to rest. His Shesher Kobita can be termed as an apt tribute to the Bard, as the film is well-made and has been able to retain the essence of a love story well ahead of its time. Rahul becomes Amit from the very first frame — rebellious, opinionated, suave, but at the same time, a romantic with a heart of gold. He represents the well-read and wealthy Bangali babu of pre-Independence Bengal, a charmer whose strength and intensity amaze everyone as soon as he meets his soulmate, Labanya. Rahul's acting seems a wee bit forced sometimes, but Konkona looks like this character was written keeping her in mind! Understated and strong, yet vulnerable and emotional, Konkona's Labanya is a delight to watch.

But Sesher Kobita is as much DoP Sirsha Ray's film as it is Suman Mukhopadhyay's. Through his camera, we find ourselves in the midst of the misty, green valleys of Shillong. Almost all the outdoor frames are visual delights and stand as a brilliant backdrop for Amit and Labanya's poignant story. Debajyoti Mishra's music and Dev R Nil's costumes successfully transport the audience to a bygone era.

Swastika Mukherjee as Ketaki is a very good choice. She is haughty but helpless in her love for Amit that ultimately makes her a different person. Debdut Ghosh as Shovonlal is a revelation. Reading the novel, one may not visualise him as the silent admirer of Labanya, but he will forever be Shovonlal in your mind once you watch the film. Soumitra Chatterjee's rendition of Nibaran Chakraborty's poems and Aparna Sen's rendition of the iconic 'Hey bondhu biday' couldn't have been better. But the only thing that's missing from the film is Amit-Labanya's wishful conversation of their future together. We only wish the director hadn't edited it out.

Many young viewers today may not have read Shesher Kobita, but that won't be much of a handicap while watching this film. Suman portrays a love that is almost transcendental, its language eternal.
{[['']]}

Khelaghor

Cast: Pallavi Chatterjee, Krishna Kishore Mukherjee, Pamela, Nivedita, Sakuntala Barua, Sudip Mukherjee, Pulokita and others
Direction: Raaj Mukherjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 9 minutes

Story: Childless couple Aninda (Krishna) and Malini (Pallavi) live in Vishakhapatnam, where Aninda is a professor of English literature and Malini, a housewife. Malini, who whiles away her loneliness talking to her stuffed toys and a plastic skeleton, always ends up suspecting all girl students who visit their home for private tuitions with Aninda. This ultimately turns their married life upside down.

Review: Khelaghor is a mundane tale of love and suspicion, with nothing spectacular to offer vis-a-vis novelty. I wouldn't call it boring, but yes, it does seem to go on and on without an end in sight. Moreover, there's a lack of connect between the opening scene and the climax, as the story seems to go awry somewhere in between. A length of, maybe, 90 minutes should have kept the narrative crisper and faster.

The story tries too hard to establish the nature of relationship Aninda and Malini share. The childless couple, married for 14 years, are evidently still in love, but how long does one need to drag the story to establish this? That their life revolves around themselves, another Bengali couple, played by Sudip and Pulokita, and Malini's social worker mom ( Sakuntala Barua), is evident 30 minutes into the film. So is the fact that a lot of his girl students find Aninda attractive. But the story beats around the bush a bit too much when it comes to showing Malini's suspicious nature. Moreover, a strange approach is employed to show Aninda's weakness towards the young girls flocking around him. Why does he imagine the girls sitting next to him in the car and confessing their lust for him? And if it's some kind of a fantasy, why does he react as if he's seen ghosts?

As for performances, most are mediocre at best. This includes the lead cast of Krishna and Pallavi. Pamela, as Aninda's infatuated student, seems to be 'acting' most of the time, looking comfortable as a young and chirpy seductress, but scoring low when it comes to displaying emotions. Her chemistry with her on-screen brother seems really forced.

Then there are the goofs that could have been easily avoided with a little more attention to detail. For one, Malini's old and regularly used diary looks sparkling new when it lands in Aninda's hands. Then again, the opening scene shows Aninda going up to a mental hospital official and getting permission to see 'her'. Even the nurse looks pretty pally and comfortable around him, as if he often visits. But the closing scenes tell a different story, which fails to connect with the opening scene. Quite an avoidable error. The director or story-writer has the story clear in their minds, but the audience is not that blessed. They need help to connect the dots. That help is missing in the latter part of the film.

Overall, Khelaghor is an avoidable film, but not unwatchable. It does have a decent storyline backed by decent performances. So, the decision is yours.
{[['']]}

Choukath…The Threshold

ast: Tota Roy Chowdhury, Sreelekha Mitra, Bidipta Chakraborty, Ardhendu Banerjee
Direction: Raja Dasgupta
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 48 minutes

Ronojoy Mitra (Tota Roy Choudhury) and his wife Debi ( Sreelekha Mitra) become the victims of a car accident, but Debi mysteriously disappears from the accident site. Next morning, she returns home, only to face questions on her morality.

Raja Dasgupta's debut film Choukath... The Threshold raises pertinent questions and reveals our societal hypocrisy about women's independence, morality and the notion of purity. It's true that if a woman, hailing from an upper-middle class family, goes missing for a night and can't remember on returning home where she was and who helped her, her credibility doesn't get the benefit of the doubt. But in this film, the basic premise is so full of loopholes that despite decent performances, the end result feels like a dish without salt.

For instance, when Debi returns home all bruised and disoriented, merely a few hours after the accident, her loving husband doesn't for once think that she may need medical attention or at least some rest before she can answer questions. When she says she was in hospital and couldn't remember the details, no one gives her the chance to recuperate, but tags her as a fallen woman. What follows is Debi's struggle to survive and keep her self-esteem intact. But the premise, on which the film is based, is so weak in logic that Debi's humiliation, pain or Ronojoy's internal struggle never touch any chord. Moreover, the production values make you feel like you are watching a telefilm on the big screen. It wouldn't have mattered if the film finished within an hour instead of the 108 minute runtime.

Still Choukath is watchable because of the performances. Sreelekha as Debi is understated and dignified in her pain and helplessness. Tota is also believable as Ronojoy, so is Ardhendu Banerjee as Tota's father. But it's Bidipta Chakraborty as the couple's friend Sreyashi who steals the show. Sreyashi seems the only sane person among these unreasonable people and her strength of character and compassion are beautifully portrayed by Bidipta. On the other hand, Saayoni Ghosh as the TV journalist Konika is a disappointment. The director may have briefed her to be brash and bold, but she takes it to a level where she is obnoxious and irritating.
{[['']]}

Manihara

Manihara Story: Former CBI officer and private investigator Rudrajit Roy (Chiranjeet) is roped in by industrialist Arun Chowdhury (Neel) to probe the mysterious disappearance of his wife Monideepa (Sohini). His investigation reveals an eerie tale of frustration and betrayal.
Cast: Chiranjeet Chakraborty, Sohini Sarkar, Argha Deep Chatterjee, Neel Mukherjee, Biplab Chatterjee, Manasi Sinha, Late Kunal Padhi, Debranjan Nag, Rii
Direction: Subhabrata Chatterjee
Genre: Horror
Duration: 2 hours 9 minutes

Manihara Review: Manihara binds you to your seat for more than two hours straight, giving you goosebumps at times and sucking you into the narrative at others. And if it's a debut directorial, I guess we need more such debutants. From the opening credits to the last jolt, the film flows smooth and easy, shocking only when it's meant to. That makes it a really good watch, though the storyline has its share of holes.
It's technically sound and the editing, especially, is excellent and adds fantastic detail to the narrative. When Monideepa is writing her last letter, the snappy cuts to her jewellery, or the way the shots shift between the floor indicators and Rudrajit when he rides down a lift adds an almost ad-like momentum to the narrative. Some shots, too, are excellent, especially those involving Monideepa. The correct use of light and shadows heightens the tension. But the music, especially the background score, takes the cake. Bob Stevens has done a fantastic job of jolting you from your seats every time the narrative takes a turn towards the supernatural. Even the few songs have been beautifully woven into the storyline. The use of digital effects, too, has been really balanced.

Coming to the performances, every actor has more or justified their character. Chiranjeet looks and acts like the sleuth he is, sans the 'I'm a super sleuth' aura that's so common on the big screen. As for Sohini, she has put up a subdued and subtle performance that goes perfectly with her character. She manages to portray her sensuous femininity, her obsessive lust for jewellery and her thirst for true love quite well. Argha Deep, who plays Moni's ex-boyfriend, has also pulled off a pretty decent act. But the performance that takes the cake is that of Biplab Chatterjee, who plays Argha's landlord. He not only adds a hint of comedy to the narrative but actually goes about it with a natural flair.
When it comes to the storyline itself, it seems the script needed some more work. For one, Rudrajit always carries around Moni's last letter, but its contents are never revealed. Why does it intrigue him? What's so mysterious about it? Second, the story spans two years, but doesn't explain what happens in between. Why do things suddenly take a turn after two years? No logical explanation. Such holes are not expected in a film that is supposed to be an altogether new take on a story told before. But, as I said at the outset, Manihara makes for a great watch. And I'm sure you'll love it like I did.
{[['']]}

Sesh Anka

Raina (Parno), the daughter of business tycoon Ritobrata Roychoudhury (Shankar), is arrested for killing an NRI businessman. What follows is a thrilling ride, as ace lawyer Pronoy Dasgupta (Dipankar De) join hands with ACP Prithwiraj (Samadarshi) and elusive private eye John Braganza (Mir) to prove her innocence.

Cast: Dipankar De, Parno Mittra, Samadarshi Dutta, Mir Afsar Ali, June Malia, Arindam Sil, Shankar Chakraborty, Debolina Dutt, Atanu Barman, Shataf Figar, Debaprasad Halder
Direction: Tathagata Banerjee
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 2 hours 3 minutes

Review: Sesh Anka won't make your knuckles go white gripping the seat handles, but it's surely a web well woven. What's more; it doesn't have that predictable cliched storyline. That, for certain, makes for a great thriller.

The strength of the film lies in something pretty basic — the casting. Almost every actor fits their character like a glove, and they have more or less done justice to their roles. Dipankar De looks and acts perfect as the pot-bellied, retired ace criminal lawyer, Shankar Chakraborty looks pretty much like the self-made business tycoon, whom he plays pretty well, Samadarshi is quite believable as the cynical cop, and Mir...well, better not character-zone him, chameleonic as his role is. But he shines in the many avatars of the elusive private eye, John Braganza. Though his appearances are short and few, he manages to play every character to the hilt and also adds to the mystery to the film. But Debolina looks a tad young for the role of the scheming Minakshi Bhattacharya. If Minakshi had been around since Raina's childhood, pushing the girl's mother — who is also her lover Ritobrata's wife — to suicide, a slightly older look would have suited her better. But she doesn't look that age, though she has played the character really well. June, however, looks perfect as Amrita — the mother of Raina's deceased friend, Payel, though she looks too stoic at times. Arindam Sil, too, looks and acts perfectly as her husband, Alokesh Banerjee, who is also a VP in a private TV news channel and a childhood friend of Ritobrata.

The film hardly has any significant goof-up, except Minakshi and Ritobrata's introductory scene, where the former seems to be smoking an unlit cigarette. Though her face is out of focus when she drags on the fag, there is no tell-tale glow at the burning end. Apart from this, the police investigation feels a bit sketchy, as the narrative leaves out the details. This, no doubt, adds to the mystery, but it also makes the story jump from A to B without the right reasons.

But overall, Sesh Anka is surely a thriller that is worth every paisa you pay to watch it. It manages to keep you glued to your seat with some great camerawork and a fast, racy storyline that refuses to let you guess the climax.
{[['']]}

Boudi.com

Five brothers, named after the Pandavas of Mahabharata, live in a city of huge houses and almost no population. When the only servant of the house, tired of catering to their myriad needs and wishes makes a mess of things, they realize that the house needs a woman's touch. So each starts trying to get the eldest brother Yudhishthir (Saswata) get married to a girl of their own choice. Pandemonium ensues when their choices clash with Yudhishthir's own.

Cast: Saswata Chatterjee, Rachna Banerjee
Direction: Raaj Mukherjee
Genre: Comedy
Duration: 2 hours 16 minutes

Review: From the opening scene to the climax, the amount of slapstick humour in the film can put a David Dhawan or a Govinda to shame. The director grossly miscalculates the potential of an unfunny script and Saswata and Rachna sleepwalk through their roles.

Some may still want to watch the film because of Saswata Chatterjee, who has a reputation of having the Midas touch or for Rachna Banerjee, who is hugely popular on TV. But 10 minutes into the film, you realize that this Saswata is a far cry from the actor we saw in Kahaani or Meghe Dhaka Tara. Still, he manages to make Yudhisthir's character lovable. Rachna, however, acts and talks exactly like she does when she is conducting a game show on TV — minimum voice modulation, the exact same smile for almost all the scenes. Also, she has absolutely no chemistry with Saswata. And, the lesser said about the other actors the better. Especially Samrat, who, with his beefcake appearance, grates on the senses. However, Parthasarathi as the servant Kanto and Sumit Samaddar and Kanchan Mullick as professional matchmakers are worth the screen time they have been given.
{[['']]}

Roga Howar Shohoj Upaye

Story: Joy (Parambrata Chatterjee), a five-star hotel's chef, has a foodie wife, Ranjana (Raima Sen). Their blissful life gets disrupted when Ranjana's fear of gaining weight turns into an obsession
Cast: Parambrata Chatterjee, Raima Sen, Riya Sen, Neel Mukherjee, Kamalika Banerjee, Rudranil Ghosh
Direction: Debaloy Bhattacharya
Genre: Comedy
Duration: 2 hours 2 minutes
Show Timings in Your City
Review: Body shaming, our society's tendency to equalize beauty with thinness, obsession with the size-zero figure — Debaloy Bhattacharya's Roga Howar Shohoj Upaye is supposed to be a funny, sarcastic take on all of this. But in order to cater to today's audience, Debaloy ditches black humour for mindless comedy. In that sense, Debaloy has succesfully made a 'comedy' though it elicits no laughter. Not even a chuckle.
Though the director, who is also the script writer, leaves no stone unturned to make us laugh — dialogues full of sexual innuendos, scenes full of animation and graphics, and an overwhelming number of bizarre dream sequences. Debaloy, as the chief chef, also tries to sprinkle some self-deprecating humour (Joy and Ranjana repeatedly say, "Etake comedy banate hobe. Comedy na holey hit hobe na!") and philosophy over the khichuri that he has cooked. But as we all know, too many cooks spoil the broth. That's exactly what has happens with this film. In the total two hours, the first 45 minutes are dedicated to Joy and Ranjana's relationship. It gets monotonous, because it could have been depicted in half the time. But when Joy proposes to Ranjana in an animated eggplant field, or when comic strip character Bantul The Great comes out of the pages to run a seductive finger along the bulging backside of the slimming-centre lady (Kamalika), you realise that there's no 'shohoj upaye' to make people laugh.
Actors, however, have put in their best. Parambrata Chatterjee's Joy has charmed all. So has Raima Sen with her sweetness and vulnerability. Riya Sen, on the other hand, doesn't have much to do apart from looking sultry and she does that with aplomb. Lastly, Neel Mukherjee as Joy's boss and Anindya Bose as Ranjana's drunk boss are the only two characters, whose sequences just about make this film paisa vasool.
{[['']]}

Dakbaksho

Avro (Satrajit), a freelance photographer, enters the life of frustrated documentary maker Srija (Supriti) amidst a scenario filled with mistrust, deceit and mystery.
Cast: Supriti Choudhury, Satrajit Sarkar, Pradip Roy, Pradip Moulik, Subrata Chokroborty and others
Direction: Prosenjit Choudhury & Abhijit Chowdhury
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 1 hour 51 minutes


Review: Dakbaksho is thriller that starts good but goes too soft towards the end. Then there is the rather gripping mystery that falls flat on its face once the plot is unravelled.

The reason for this are many. For one, the actors somehow fail to live up to the momentum, and put in rather damp performances just when the situation demanded more. For one, Satrajit is good as the eccentric photographer, but fails to make a mark once his true identity is revealed. The same goes for Supriti and Pradip Roy, who plays a pipe-smoking important-looking character quite well till the storyline virtually spoils his character. The other actors are average at best, some making it amply clear that they are acting with their unnecessary overacting.

The music is fine, a couple of songs pretty good, but it hardly adds anything to the film. A thriller definitely demands support from the music department, especially the background score. But in this case, it's too flat to add to the mystery.

Visually too, it's an average experience, with no shot to highlight as such. In fact, there's this often promoted shot where Supriti swaps position in a cab in two subsequent shots. While one shot shows her sitting to the right of Avro in the passenger seat, the next shows her resting her chin on the left window and smiling at the view outside. A jarring discontinuinity, if not anything else. Overall, Dakbaksho is a film you can watch, as it's relatively good despite being a launchpad for so many debutants, including the directors and lead actors. But the ultimate choice is yours.
{[['']]}

Asha Jaoar Majhe (Labour of Love)

The film revolves around a couple, too busy making a living to have time for each other

Cast: Ritwick Chakraborty, Basabdutta Chatterjee and others
Direction: Aditya Vikram Sengupta
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 24 minutes

Review: Labour of Love is a breath of fresh air in a medium that relies heavily on dialogues to make an impact. More importantly, the fact that the film has none of it doesn't really alter its beauty. It shows, rather convincingly at that, how drama and detailing can keep the audience glued to seats even if none of the actors mouth a single word.

Speaking of drama, it's the realness that strikes a chord. Both the characters, played by Ritwick and Basabdutta, go about life in such a mundane, unhurried kind of way that the film seems to be a documentary about a day in the life of a lower middle-class working couple, with the recession as the backdrop. And they are good, really good, in whatever they do in front of the camera within those 84-odd minutes. Their body language and actions tell the story of anyone not born with a silver spoon in the mouth.

But the highlight of the film, without which it wouldn't been half of what it turned out to be, is the attention to detail. It traces the couple's life in minute detail, sketching out their work and personal routines using a sequence of strokes to create the complete picture. From that hook on the wall where both hang the house keys, the towel laid out to dry by the kitchen sink, to the notches on the ceiling fan regulator — everything contributes to creating the circle around which the couple's life revolves. Even the content of their tiffin boxes are the same, and so is lunch and dinner. Each and every dot is connected and accounted for. The depiction of the only black-and-white moment in the couple's life when they meet for a few romantic minutes in the morning is truly touching and well portrayed.
Despite all this, Labour of Love can't be called flawless. And in its case, it's the unnecessary panning and prolonged focus employed in many scenes. For one, there is this almost 360-degree pan in a scene involving Ritwick. The camera pans away from him eating a cake, goes nearly a complete circle, and ends up on a red oxide-painted wall, consuming nearly 2 minutes. Don't expect a classic continuation sequence, because there is none. It is simply followed by a cut, which is a bit jarring. Then again, there's this prolonged focus on the turning wheels of Ritwick's bicycle as he returns from work. It's again followed by an abrupt cut.

But that's just a technical point and doesn't make any difference to the beauty of the film. And it's surely a film you shouldn't miss. It will remind you how actions can speak louder than words.
{[['']]}

Auto 9696

The film is a story of Kelo's journey from being an auto driver to a superstar.

Cast: Arjun Chakrabarty, Amrita Chattopadhyay, Ankita Majumder
Direction: Aritra Mukherjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 43 minutes

Review: The movie is a series of filmi cliches that we have been watching and re-watching for god-knows how many years. As all of us are big on listicles nowadays, so let's go through the cliches one by one:

Cliche number one: Auto driver Kelo wants to be a hero and regularly dreams of romancing his favourite heroine. While driving his auto, he interacts with many of the film industry people as his route is through the studio para in Tollygunge. His hero-like outfits remind you of Salman Khan, who is an undisputed god for autowallahs in our country. He relentlessly distributes his pictures in various studios for a big break. Can't you already guess what will happen next? This context gives way to the next cliche.

Cliche number two: Enter the heroine, Chumki (Amrita). Obviously she is his childhood friend, motherless and living with a strict father. She cooks, earns by sewing clothes and most importantly, secretly loves Kelo. Her unrequited love prompts her to lend him money, support his dream and suffer silently knowing that he loves another. Remember Ayesha Jhulka in Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar?

Cliche three: Continuing from our first point, when nobody is giving patta to our auto driver hero with a heart of gold, what else do we need? Of course, a makeover. We, the Indian audience, know this from watching numerous 'behenji bani babe' makeovers in films and TV serials. So, Chumki lends Rs 20,000 to Kelo, which he uses to get an acting course and a complete makeover. We're sure, at this point, Arjun Chakrabarty must have given a relieved sigh to get rid of the grey pallor of makeup that the director must have decided an auto driver should have. Come on, how can an auto driver have fair complexion?

Cliche four: The love triangle. When Kelo becomes a famous hero and starts having a relationship with co-actress and dreamgirl Juhi (Ankita), we all know that he will not end up with her. Again predictably, there's a last-minute realization of love, chase sequence and like all the previous film of this genre, a happy ending.

The film is barely watchable because of Arjun and Amrita's performances. They are effortless in portraying the enterprising Kelo and the simple Chumki. But the script is full of over-smart dialogues and unnecessary puns. It's also fixated on bowel movements. The audience may have warmed up to this concept on screen after watching Piku, but not everyone is an Amitabh Bachchan and not every film has a Deepika or Irrfan. So, if you want to watch Auto No 9696, apart from a few performances, the film or the story has nothing much to offer.
{[['']]}

Family Album

Their four-member family looks picture perfect, but is full of lovelorn hearts that seek true love. And it's this quest and its aim that dominates their lives.

Cast: Swastika Mukherjee, Paoli Dam, Ronodeep Bose, Riya Sen, Kaushik Sen and others
Direction: Mainak Bhaumik
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 54 minutes


Review: Family Album is a mature film. That's not because it trains the lens on some sombre aspects of our society and their impact on human emotions and relationships. In fact, that's exactly what it does. But the beauty of the storytelling lies in its mature use of humour.

It's not a laughter riot. Had it been that, the story would've surely suffocated to death. But Mainak has used a simpler approach. He kept the storytelling easy and real. As a result, you don't see anyone act. Every character goes about life, maybe just as they would in real life, fumbling, groping for words, passing witty remarks, laughing, crying.... Well, it's always a treat to watch a film that doesn't feel like one. And that's how real Family Album feels.

Coming to performances, Paoli and Swastika display such crackling chemistry that they could well become the next hit jodi of Tollywood! No kidding! The two actresses seem completely at ease even while smooching. Individually, they have literally become their screen characters - Paoli, the chronically depressed ace photographer with a tomboyish appeal, and Swastika, the fumbling bespectacled bookworm who even buys a book to understand the nuances of lesbian sex after she meets her lady in shining armour! As for team Riya-Ronodeep, the emotions are just there, but for the actress's overuse of English. In fact, every character feels real.

The next best thing about the film is its music, especially the songs. Subtle, yet melodious, the songs surely drive the emotions home. Even the background score blends perfectly with the storyline. But it's the end that leaves a lot to the imagination. A bit too much I'd say. Its abruptness doesn't hurt, but does leave a void that could've been filled up a teeny-weeny bit to save us the after-thought.
In a nutshell, Family Album is surely a film you can watch alone or with adult companions. It will give you some invaluable insight into why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, or maybe how you can avoid judging altogether.
{[['']]}

Jamai 420

Story: Three couples elope to Bangkok to set things right after a series of unfortunate incidents turn their love lives upside down.
Cast: Ankush Hazra, Soham Chakraborty, Hiran, Nusrat Jahan, Mimi Chakraborty, Payel Sarkar, Kharaj Mukherjee and others
Direction: Ravi Kinagi
Genre: Comedy
Duration: 2 hours 18 minutes


Review: Jamai420 is more than two hours of mindless madness. So mindless that it could even give a Sajid Khan film a run for its money! I mean, why? Why would a successful divorce lawyer like Joy (Ankush) leave his roaring career behind and rush off to Bangkok to set his love life right? Just to give the film the right settings for a few song and dance sequences? Even the settings were not good enough. Poolside fountains can be found in abundance in India. Why would a luxury hotel in Bangkok have a reservation desk clerk who is Bengali by birth, looks Caribbean, and behaves like Martin Lawrence as Big Momma? Why would three families.... Wait, make that four. So, why would four families, including the borderline insane avatar of Biswanath Basu and his gun-toting mother, rush off to Bangkok at the drop of a hat? Moreover, Shankar Chakraborty as Mimi's father deserves a mention in the record books for surviving more than 100 strokes and still going strong! And finally, why spend money to make such a film and drop it on unsuspecting people?
Now that we are done with the pleasantries, let's start a little dissection. First, acting. All the actors in the film have managed to take hamming to the next level. Kharaj Mukherjee, Shantilal Chakraborty, Supriyo Dutta, Biswajit Chakraborty and Shankar Chakraborty are right up there, at the top. The only non-hammers were the girls in the cast and Hiran, as Ankush, Soham leave no stone unturned to act as loud as possible. But I guess that's maybe because the director wouldn't settle for less. But the result was a hamfest, with each actor trying to out-overact the others. Music. Well, can't say it's bad; just run-of-the-mill commercial stuff that makes you shake a leg for a week or so before fading into oblivion.
And now, the most pertinent part. Comedy. Slapstick; heavy on slaps, but nothing that sticks. In fact, one wonders how can Biswanath Basu getting slapped every third minute be considered even remotely close to being funny?
The bottomline? Jamai 420 has three good looking girls, three relatively handsome guys, a helluva lot of angry parents and tonnes of nonsense. If you're ready to go through hell to see the girls dancing in wet hot pants or think you can tolerate constant catcalls from the general audience to watch the hero of your dreams, go ahead and watch the film.
{[['']]}

Room No. 103

Room No. 103 tells the story of a mysterious hotel room and how the lives of those who stay there change — for better or for worse.
Cast: Soumitra Chatterjee, Anjana Basu, Badshah Maitra, Rajesh Sharma, Ankita, Anindyo Bose, Jisshu U Sengupta, Priyanka
Direction: Aniket Chattopadhyay
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 2 hours 1 minute


Review: The film opens with the hotel manager Rudra Chatterjee (Soumitra), who, like a puppeteer, plays with the fates of unsuspecting customers by assigning them to the cursed Room No. 103. He then narrates the stories to the audience without explaining how he gets to know what is going on inside the room at night. Even if you decide to ignore this impossibility, as soon as the first story gets over, you get the drift of the film — it is neither a thriller nor drama. The mixed bag of stories is predictable, some of them mildly interesting because of the performances, but some disappointing — also because of the performances.
Take the first story of the two star-crossed lovers — Dyotona (Anjana Basu) and Imdadul (Badshah). They portray their characters, both as college students and as a middle-aged couple, with equal ease. But the end is so predictable that you lose interest halfway through the story. In the second story involving a contract killer Tirtha Majumder (Rajesh), the director has tried to add many layers to the character. But a weak storyline and repetitive dialogues pull the tale down. Tirtha keeps repeating the line, Aamar ar bhalo lage na, to the point that you want to do something violent to him.
The third story, though very mediocre, gets most of the footage for some unknown reason. It's a story of a jilted lover, Madhabilata (Ankita), whose life is altered after she meets Kanchana in the hotel and stays in Room No. 103. Ankita portrays the role of a vulnerable girl well. Here, the director takes a wrong call by casting Kanchana in the role of Madhabilata's saviour. The actress, playing a loud-mouthed and crass girl with a heart of gold, goes so OTT that you cringe every time she opens her mouth. However, the director saves the best for the last. Jisshu and Priyanka's story is dark and disturbing. This story of an ageing and womanizing filmmaker and a struggling actress ticks all the right boxes in terms of content, form and picturisation. Kudos to Jisshu and Priyanka for superb performances. They are a principal reason why the audience may feel that two hours in the theatre haven't gone completely to waste.
{[['']]}

Kadambari

Kadambari Devi enters the Tagore household as philanderer Jyotindranath's wife at the age of nine, only to find herself lonely and sidelined. This lays the foundations for her bond with young Rabindranath — a relationship that grows with them till others start noticing their closeness.

Direction: Suman Ghosh
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 30 minutes


Review: Kadambari is a pure entertainer. No, not the least mindless or illogical, but a rather intelligently made film that keeps you glued to the screen throughout its 90-minute-long life. But in showing the bonding and the inevitable romance between Rabindranath (Parambrata) and his sister-in-law, it does miss out on a distinct storyline. It kind of begins and ends with Kadambari Devi (Konkona), though it isn't really a biopic. I'm saying that because anyone trying to draw historical parallels with the series of incidents depicted in the film might be a mite disappointed. But yes, it's a wholly watchable film because every actor has lived his/her part; though Parambrata is a bit of a disappointment. Somehow, he sticks to his typical expressions and mannerisms — never really becoming the poet he is playing. But the same can't be said for Konkona, who is subtle, yet expressive. Kaushik Sen, too, look the part of a suave gentlemen with a colourful life. The show-stealer is, however, Titas Bhowmik, who breathes life into the character of Gyanodanandini. She manages to depict her subtle romance with Jyotindranath and her own ego clash with Kadambari with elan.
The biggest high in the film, however, is the music. Every sound, every song is mesmerizing, if not more. Hats off to Bikram Ghosh for such good work. Even the background score is soothing. But it's really jarring on the nerves when Parambrata sings in his own voice hardly a few minutes after lip-syncing to a playback by Ustad Rashid Khan! I'm not saying the actor doesn't sing well; but the contrast is too sharp to go unnoticed.
The cinematography, too, is great, creating just the right ambience for the period. The shots are tight and balanced — never revealing too much of the backdrop, especially in the mansion scenes. But the boat scene, especially the close-ups, seem a bit off-kilter, as nothing seems to move — not even the boat. It's a full moon night out in the middle of a river, and no breeze seems to blow and the boat refuses to rock! A bit odd...
Over all, Kadambari is a film you shouldn't miss. Yes, it has its minor flaws, but as I mentioned at the outset, when it comes to being an entertainer, it gets full marks. Watch it as you would any other romantic drama. You are bound to enjoy it.
{[['']]}

Nirbaak

Story: It's a medley of four tales of silent love, involving one woman (Sushmita), three men (Anjan, Jisshu and Ritwick), a tree and a dog.

Cast: Susmita Sen, Anjan Dutt, Jisshu U Sengupta, Ritwick Chakraborty
Direction: Srijit Mukherjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 49 minutes

Review: Nirbaak is a numbing experience. It kind of stuns you into silence. How can someone brew up such a heady concoction of unbridled imagination and unbelievable tales and dish it out to an unsuspecting audience? Not fair.

That's not to say it is bad cinema. It boasts of some excellent camerawork, crisp editing, good background score, fine samples of acting, two decent stories and a truly beautiful sutradhaar (Sushmita). But that's about it. The rest of it just hovers a few feet above the average head-line in the theatre, bounces off the nirbaak walls and fades into silence.

The film starts on a rather good note, with Anjan Dutt playing a hyper-narcissistic loner to perfection. But, somehow, he fails to become the character. His Bow Barracks-black-shades-suede-shoes-summer-coat identity hangs heavily in the air all through his act. Result: we just see Anjan Dutt French kissing his mirror image, emptying a whole can of deo on himself and even masturbating on bed, fantasizing about... yes, Anjan Dutt. A little tweaking with his done-to-death signature wardrobe would have made a big difference.

Then comes the shocking story of a tree in love — a tree that fantasizes about Sushmita dancing and seems to have an orgasm watching her sleep on a bench under it. Really? The other two stories are much gentler on your gastric juices, but the abrupt ends to all four tales kind of grate on one's nerves, especially the constant strain on different body systems. Why put a rather normal woman among a set of rather unnerving characters, each tottering on the verge of insanity? For instance, Ritwick whiles away minutes gazing lovingly at a frozen corpse and even brushing its hair. The only two normal characters in the scheme of things — Sushmita and Jisshu — are, again, on a short leash when it comes to displaying their acting prowess. Except for a short burst of passion and a snappy display of anger, Jisshu hardly gets any scope to act to his potential. Same goes for his onscreen ladylove, Sushmita.

Nirbaak has some great camerawork and the background score, too, doesn't meddle with the visuals. Yes, there are a few goof-ups, like the shot after a storm that ravages the 'tree in love'. It's apparent that the broken branches have been sourced from somewhere else. After all, a storm can break branches, but it cannot strip off every leaf. Nor can it turn the branches dry. A dog can push down the handle of a car door to open it. But modern luxury sedans don't have push handles. Can a dog really pull a small semi-concealed latch to open the car door? But the pertinent question is, can a tree have an orgasm? A scene seemed to suggest just that. And all this is a tribute to Salvador Dali! Don't believe it? Go, watch the film.
{[['']]}

Belaseshe

Biswanath Mazumdar (Soumitra Chatterjee) shocks his son and daughter-in-law (Shankar and Indrani), three daughters (Rituparna, Aparajita and Monami) and their husbands (Sujoy, Kharaj and Anindya) by announcing to his decision to divorce his wife, Aarti, (Swatilekha Sengupta) after 49 years of marriage. What follows is an emotional re-discovery of the institution of marriage.

Direction: Nandita Roy and Shiboprosad Mukherjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 21 minutes


Review: Belaseshe is one film that refuses to end. In fact, it has been more than 24 hours since I walked out of the theatre, but the sounds and images created by a septuagenarian couple's tryst with the myopia that plagues modern-day marriages linger on. Each minute that has ticked by since has been pregnant with some form of realization — about life, relationships and, most of all, about marriage. And every passing minute has added to my conviction that cinema can change things — for better, or worse. Maybe Belaseshe can even mend marriages on the verge of falling apart. That, my friend, is powerful cinema.

Also Read: What does a touch mean in a relationship? — Celeb Speak

Its power doesn't lie in the good cinematography, the great direction, the powerful and engaging performances by all the actors, or the good music. It lies in the surprising simplicity of the storyline. And the deep emotional reaction it elicits from every member of the audience. Why, most in the audience wept and laughed with the characters for well over 2 hours. And it would be an injustice to say I didn't. It's a story that touched some hidden chord deep inside.

And that's because it asks questions through its characters that make you sit up and look inward. When have I done that last? That keeps happening in my life too! Could that be the reason why my wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriend is offended? These are some of the questions anyone watching the film might ask themselves, of course, when they are not busy laughing or wiping tears. As for the technical aspects of the film, there's nothing exceptional. It's a good production with good camerawork, good music and good direction. The songs, too, are well-placed and the background score complements the visuals and their moods. Acting-wise, Soumitra Chatterjee and Swatilekha Sengupta are, as usual, at their seasoned best, though Kharaj and Aparajita take the cake with their energy and fantastic comic timing. The others, including the child actors, have done absolute justice to their roles. Not one misplaced shot, no goof-up, no jerk.

But even such perfection would have come a naught had it not been for the gem of a concept and the brilliant script. And that's exactly why you should watch Belaseshe with that very person who you started out loving, but of late, have begun to view more as a boring habit. You'll not only walk out of the theatre with a smile, but a 'habit' you wouldn't want to change.
{[['']]}

Jhumura

Story: Rwik (Samadarshi) and Sahana (Sohini), two young journalists from Kolkata, visit Purulia to dig up interesting information on the dying folk art form, jhumur. There, they meet an elderly couple (Kuchil Mukherjee and Gopa Sengupta), who tell them the musical love story of Kanchan and Kusum and of Jhumura, a tribal village.

Cast:Sohini Sarkar, Samadarshi Dutta, Sabitri Chatterjee, Kuchil Mukherjee, Gopa Sengupta, Sourav Chakrabarty, Tania Kar
Direction: Anindya Chatterjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 54 minutes

Review: Jhumura is poetry in motion. And the credit for that largely goes to the slow (a bit too slow at times) yet smooth storyline penned by the director himself and the excellent cinematography by Mrinmoy Nandi. From connecting the dots using a mute mask-seller to portraying the haplessness of Kanchan's first wife (Tania) with a dry leaf pushed around by a breeze, the film surely stands out for the simple magnificence of each frame and the thoughts that went into creating such a visual tapestry.

Add to this visual flow the fluidity of music — rustic and mellow — and Jhumura becomes a journey for the senses. You rise and fall with the hills and streams, the dawns and dusks, of Purulia, and feel your heart soar or sink with the soulful jhumur tunes. Moreover, the battle of the art form with modern entertainment alternatives over the decades has been portrayed with clarity.

But everyone seems so busy creating technical magic that no one seems to notice the flaws in the storyline. Yes, the flow is smooth, free of jumps or hiccups, but it leaves out vital pieces that precipitate confusing thoughts once you walk out of the theatre. Inside, you are too overwhelmed by the visual treat to think, but no such bindings exist outside. For one, the relationship between Sahana and Rwik is a confusing afterthought. The film fails to establish their growing fondness for each other. It hits you suddenly at one scene or two. Moreover, the story loses track of the demands of journalistic research. After all, no hard story can be written based on a love story of lore; journalists need facts and photographs. The two young journalists seem to lose track of that basic requirement as the film progresses.

Then again, it's the confusing timeframes. If the tale of Kanchan and Kusum is part of history (as made apparent by the barren hill on which once stood Kusum's village, Jhumura), then why hasn't the mask-seller aged? Even if we assume him to be a symbolic yet mute sutradhar, how can a thriving village disappear in just a few decades and why? We are basing these questions on the last chronological reference point in the Kusum-Kanchan tale — the screening of the Hindi film Amar Akbar Anthony. Assuming that the film reached the remote village, say, six months after its release, we can peg the timeframe around mid or late 1977. So, in the intervening 38 years, Jhumura is wiped out from the face of the earth, but the mask-seller refuses to age?

Moreover, the fate of Kusum and Kanchan is never revealed. If they are still alive, they would be in their sixties or seventies. So, do the storytellers (Kuchil and Gopa) relive their own tale of love? That, Mr Director, is too complex a riddle. You shouldn't have left it to the audience to figure out such a vital bit of the storyline. Jhumura is not exactly a Byomkesh tale, is it? So, despite creating such an audio-visual treat, we can't afford even a star more than two and a half. A little more attention to detail would have surely earned you at least a star more.

Now, coming to the acting department, we must say that the technical excellence of the film does create an additional burden on the actors to keep their performances on a par. Sohini is quite convincing, both as city girl Sahana and village beauty Kusum, and Samardashi nails it as photojournalist Rwik and village lad Kanchan. But, somehow, the two should have worked a bit more on their on-screen chemistry. Their constant arguments towards the beginning of the film seem almost forced at times. And though all other actors have done complete justice to their roles, just one star for acting.

Over all, Jhumura is an emotional film, a bit on the slow side, but still engaging. So, for a change, go and watch something that is miles away from mindless violence and item numbers and indulge your finer senses. You won't regret it.
{[['']]}

89

Purba ( Raima Sen), a psychiatrist by profession, witnesses a bomb blast in her city. The trauma unearths some dark secrets from her past. With the help of ATS officer Anup ( Shataf Figar) and a hypnotist ( Barun Chanda), she comes face to face with a serial killer who changed her life.
Cast: Saswata Chatterjee, Raima Sen, Shataf Figar, Barun Chanda
Direction: Manoj Michigan
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 1 hour 50 minutes

Review: What defines a well-made psychological thriller? Is it the intricacy of plot? An element of surprise? Excellent performances? Or the unexpected twist in the end? It's a bit of all and though Tollywood doesn't produce too many of those films, Manoj Michgan's 89 is an honest attempt with a gripping storyline, a good script and smart making.

The non-linear storyline works well here, as we get a glimpse into Purba's troubled past and how her uncertain present is affected by a cold-blooded killer, Sabyasachi. As the mystery unravels, Sabyasachi's character is revealed gradually — from a smooth-talking man to a moody and calculative fiend. The director keeps the audience guessing about his intentions. The best part is, there are no unnecessary songs or tear-jerking melodrama to dilute the tension that holds good through the movie.

With its lonely corridors, creepy alleys, dark cells and more, 89 is somewhat reminiscent of moody psychological thrillers from Hollywood and Asian cinema. The second half flags a bit though and you can second-guess the killer's intentions — not a great advertisement for the film's genre allegiance. However, there isn't a single loose string in the plot that the director forgets to tie up at the end. The performances — Raima with her big eyes and an air of vulnerability, Shataf with his street smartness and suave demeanour and most importantly, Saswata with his subtle but bone-chilling cruelty — also make this film worth a watch.
{[['']]}

Amanush 2

It’s a story of Raghu (Soham), a shy youth, who turns to violence after surviving a traumatic experience. After serving a term at a juvenile correction centre, he takes up a different identity. One lie leads another and ‘Mr Hyde’ in him surfaces… What happens next forms the crux of the story.

Cast: Soham, Paayel, Anindya Chatterjee, Surajit, Rajesh Sharma
Direction: Rajib Kumar
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 25 minutes

Review: There are two reasons why you can spend one evening watching Amanush 2 and not regret later — Soham's impressive return after last year's Golpo Holeo Sotti and a gripping storyline that keeps you glued to your seats till the end. Thankfully, like most commercial Bengali films, Amanush 2 steers clear of the typical song and dance routine, an arm-candy heroine or a ruthless villain with a country's supply of weapons at his disposal. And if these don't excite you enough, the film has a brilliant Anindya Chatterjee (as Raghu's friend Ashok), who leaves a lasting impression once again after Chotushkone.

It's not easy to make a psychological thriller that is entertaining enough to connect to the masses. Script and the screenplay writer Anindya Bose excels in that department. He sticks to the reality and never goes overboard. Though Soham has a meaty role with substantial dialogues, and shoulders the entire film, Anindya steals the thunder quite often. Performance-wise, Soham emotes every mood — shyness, craziness, timidity or insanity —in a brilliant manner. So much so that even when it is revealed that he is a crazy killer, he gets audience sympathy. Rajesh Sharma, in a short role as a bright cop, complements Soham's character perfectly.

However, this film too has its share of flaws. It is predictable to a great extent, which takes away the charm of a thriller. Paayel Sarkar, as Ashok's girlfriend Riya, looks worn out. Even her heavy make-up, trendy clothes couldn't camouflage her disinterested performance. Otherwise, it is a good one-time watch.
{[['']]}

Bitnoon

Corporate employee Rahul (Ritwick) and Moushumi (Gargi) are happily married. But they hardly have a moment of togetherness, thanks to their six-year-old son, who believe that they cannot be trusted alone! A sexually frustrated Rahul bumps into dancer Rusha (Saayoni) leading to a romantic relationship and funny consequences.

Cast: Ritwik Chakraborty, Gargi Roychoudhury, Saayoni Ghosh
Direction: Abhijit Guha & Sudeshna Roy
Genre: Comedy
Duration: 1 hour 49 minutes

Bitnoon Review: Bitnoon, as the name suggests, is a joyride through the world of extra-marital relationships with a tinge of spice and loads of laughs. And when we say joyride, we literally mean that, because the trio of Ritwick, Gargi and Saayoni make sure that every scene tickles, every dialogue elicits a guffaw. In short, watching the film is fun.

But hey, no one this side has forgotten the role of a critic; this review has just begun. So first, let's dissect Rahul, or Ritwick. And the first word that comes to mind is flawless. He gets into the ticklish groove right at the outset, his body language, his expressions screaming, "I love my wife, but don't get to make love to her!" Tch, tch, the audience goes, while slapping their knees. The actor is even better when he gets into a heated argument with his future lover Rusha in a cab, or when he spots his wife at the same resort where he goes to spend the weekend with his lover. As usual, Ritwick simply melts into character and goes about the task of a man torn between his family and lover with elan.

As for Gargi, well, she should have added more punch to her character. There was enough room. We're not saying she doesn't do justice to her role. She does, and pretty well at that. We're simply saying she could've done better, added more layers to her role of a homemaker. She is, however, perfect at showing her frustration with the domestic help, who is almost always calling in to inform she can't come to work because someone is ill in the family.

Coming to Saayoni, she's good as the persistent seductress, Rusha. But, somehow, her tomboyish appeal and her girl-next-door looks doesn't gel well with the character. But that's a casting error, and we cannot blame that on the actress. She has, in fact, done pretty well as a girl who meets Rahul purely by accident, and then goes on to fall in love with him, knowing fully well that he's married and has a kid.

But despite the good performances and the laugh-a-minute storyline, the film fails to firmly establish its characters. As a result, while we are laughing and enjoying the scenes, the background remains hazy. The focus is so much on the three central characters that it seems to be a story without a beginning or an end. The characters are shallow — the depth a backgrounder adds is missing. Rusha, especially, is a character who just pops into the storyline. She is a dancer who often performs in shows, but seems to have no family or friends, except an uncle in Switzerland who sends her chocolates. At times, her character seems to have OCD, at others, she's just a girl next door. Confusing...

Anyway, confusions apart, Bitnoon is certainly a film you can enjoy, without your kids. So, go ahead. Heal yourself with a dose of the best medicine.
{[['']]}

Ajana Batas

Deepa (Paoli) — a small-town girl who works as a copywriter in a Kolkata-based ad agency — starts having problems communicating with those around her. Whenever she wants to say something crucial, a mysterious breeze blows her words away. She sinks deeper into a shell as time passes, struggling to make her 'lost' thoughts clear to others. The film revolves around this struggle and how Deepa overcomes it.

Cast: Paoli, Vikram Chatterjee, Koushik Sen, Shankar Chakraborty and others
Direction: Late Anjan Das
Genre: Drama
Duration: 1 hour 41 minutes

Ajana Batas Review: Ajana Batas is a poetic film; in fact, a bit too poetic. But sadly, the narrative flow lacks rhythm. It can at best be compared to a child's attempt at rhyming disjointed words: The reason is missing. That's the exact question on your mind for most part of the film — why? And there's no answer. It's either fantasy with a touch of reality or reality too far-fetched to be believable. After all, Deepa's mysterious forest and its whispering breeze are only possible in a poem or a fairy-tale. If we associate it with the real world, her character seems schizophrenic.

But then, reality is an integral part of the film. Deepa is a small-town girl who lives alone in Kolkata and works in an ad agency. She travels home every weekend to be with her family and her 'different' uncle, who believes in the same whispering breeze and is considered mentally unstable by family and society. She has a love life, lives in a house too upmarket for her professional standing, eats out at expensive eateries and shows absolutely no chemistry whatsoever with any other character in the film. Then why is her character so hazy, so borderline schizophrenic

That's also where we come to the actors. Paoli for one. Push away all the other characters, and her acting seems excellent. But put her into the frame with the others, and she still seems to be acting alone! Her family doesn't feel like a family, her office is dull and lacks vibrancy, her love life is cold and unexciting. Why? In fact, the same lack of chemistry is visible among all the characters. Even Shankar Chakraborty seems very restrained while portraying Deepa's depressed mejo kaku. The only character that seems real is that of a famous poet (Kaushik Sen), who befriends Deepa with seduction in mind. His is one character that goes about life with the right emotions. The rest is a muddle.

But perhaps the most disconcerting aspect of the film is its lack of energy. Everyone goes about life without any urgency, emotions are hard to come by and hardly anyone smiles. The protagonist oscillates between reality and fantasy, and the other characters seem like well-oiled machines busy weaving a life around her dreamy existence. But no one seems connected at any level.

Ajana Batas is a slow, lifeless film that fails to get its rhythm right, a story that fails to connect with the audience, a poem that fails to evoke emotions. It's an experiment. The question is, do you want to be the guinea pig?
{[['']]}

Sajarur Kanta

Based on Saradindu Bandopadhyay's Byomkesh Bakshi novel Sajarur Kanta, the story revolves around a killer whose murder weapon is a porcupine quill.

Cast: Dhritiman Chatterjee, Konkona Sen Sharma, Indraneil Sengupta, Kaushik Sen, Dwijen Bandopadhyay, Biswajit Chakraborty
Direction: Saibal Mitra
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 2 hours 58 minutes

Review: Rajit Kapur, Uttam Kumar, Abir Chatterjee, Sujoy Ghosh, Sushant Singh Rajput and now Dhritiman Chatterjee with Jisshu U Sengupta in the line - when Saradindu Bandopadhyay created the sleuth Byomkesh Bakshi, he would never have imagined that so many actors would be eager to play the character over the years. Though the audience has been welcoming enough, the last five Byomkesh Bakshis have appeared on screen in the last five years. You could call it a Byomkesh glut — a young Byomkesh solved Benimadhab's murder on screen just a few days ago, and a younger avatar speaking in Hindi will hit the screens in a few days. So how does Dhritiman's superannuated incarnation match up?
Sajarur Kanta, the original story, is a readers' favourite and Saradindu, being a scriptwriter himself, handled the story like a film's plotline. Here, though, Saibal Mitra has given his imagination a free run in the name of turning the plot into a contemporary story. As a result, the motive, characters, denouement and circumstances are all changed. What we are served with is a three-hour yawn fest.
Konkona as Deepa and Indraneil as Debasish have done a decent job. Their chemistry is crackling but the script doesn't allow the romance to bloom. Moreover, Dhritiman's Byomkesh is quite far removed from the character we know, speaking English with a British accent and effecting theatrical expressions and dramatic entrances. Kaushik Sen's Prabal is intense but falls victim to a poor script. The film is touted as a thriller, but thanks to the poor editing there is little of that thrill left by the time the end credits roll.
{[['']]}

Bheetu

The rape and murder of two Kolkata girls send cops into a tizzy, while the perpetrators carry on with their perverted activities. One of them, Rony (Ritwick), stalks Sohini (Parno), who is in a relationship with Andy (Shaheb) — an hotelier’s son. Sohini and her elder sister Rohini (Sudiptaa), who are already traumatized by a childhood molestation incident, are forced to retaliate when Rony gets violent.
Cast: Parno Mitra, Sudiptaa Chakraborty, Ritwick Chakraborty, Shaheb Bhattacharya, Kamaleshwar Mukherjee, Anindya Chatterjee
Direction: Utsav Mukherjee
Genre: Drama
Duration: 2 hours 7 minutes
 Bheetu is a racy, thrilling ride through the dark world of fearless, perverted minds and the grey abyss of fear. It's a story well told, with good sound effects and music. But what kind of grates on the nerves is its over-emphasis on all things sexual. And in that lies its failure. After all, from all angles, it's a film made to highlight the plight of women in today's porn and sex-obsessed society. Its aim, apparently, is to drive home the message that women are taken advantage of because of the fear that often paralyzes them just when they need to act. Its message: retaliate; kill if need be.

But, somewhere on the way towards this lofty aim, the film loses its way among the very things it wants the audience to abhor.

For one, Parno oozes oodles of sex appeal in hot pants and off-shoulder cleavage-showing tees in most of the film. She even has a couple of intimate scenes with boyfriend Andy (Shaheb). We have no problem with that. But the problem arises when her character happens to be that of a girl, Sohini, who is so traumatized by a childhood molestation incident that she refuses to forgive her elder sister Rohini for not rescuing her when she was being sexually exploited by their uncle. Such is her trauma that she has nightmares about the incident almost every night. This background, somehow, doesn't gel with the character we see throughout the film. Her hatred, the anger seems justified, but almost carefree personality doesn't fit into the mold her character demands.

Then there is Rony (Ritwick) — a perverted sex-obsessed youngster who thinks nothing of rape and murder. He collects women's undergarments and video-tapes almost every girl he sets his eyes on. The fact that he murders a girl at the very beginning of the film and keeps passing lewd comments about Sohini and other women well establishes the fact that he is perverted and borderline psycho. So, two scenes of him masturbating while watching videos of Sohini on his mobile phone are anything but necessary. These just add to the overly sexual tone of the film instead of adding anything to Rony's character.

Another character that's kind of contradictory is that Rohini (Sudiptaa), a wheelchair-bound 30-something woman whose husband leaves her because of her depression and psychological state. He states that her fears have driven a wedge between them. But her character seems nothing out of the ordinary. True, she is depressed after a crippling fall from a horse in Darjeeling, she has severe respiratory distress, but in no way does she seem to be in the grip of any fear.

But these critical flaws apart, the film flows quite smoothly. The storytelling is crisp, the music engaging and all the actors, including Kamaleshwar Mukherjee, who plays senior police officer, K Dasgupta, are good. Dasgupta is the officer in charge of the rape and double murder case. Sudiptaa, especially, is flawless as the crippled woman, who is torn between her own marital problems and her sister's hatred for her. Ritwick, too, manages to be as revolting as his character demands. But somehow, his role refuses to stand out, as he seems to be playing the same character over and over again for the last several films. The same north Kolkata mannerism and the same kind of dialogues. 'Stereotyped' seems stamped all over his character. As for the rest of the cast, be it Parno, Shaheb, they have done justice to their roles.

Over all, Bheetu is a watchable film, especially for those who want to take a few lessons in perversion. As for women, well, it's better avoided.
{[['']]}

Kanchenjunga Express

Ranjana (Jaya Seal Ghosh) and Surya (Sabyasachi Chakraborty) meet while travelling to Siliguri in the Kanchenjunga Express. As they start to know each other, Surya discovers that there is more to Ranjana than meets the eye.
Cast: Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Jaya Seal Ghosh, Mumtaz Sircar, Rajatava Dutta
Direction: Arnab Ghosh
Genre: Thriller
Duration: 2 hours 8 minutes

Review: Kanchenjunga Express can be summarized in just one line — it's a thriller that fails to thrill! Director Arnab Ghosh chooses a really ambitious plot for his debut film — a woman (Mumtaz as Nandini) accused of killing her two husbands and a lover, and a cop in her pursuit. What could have been a really gripping tale of love, despair, revenge and woman empowerment (phrase-credit goes to a certain RG), turns to be a dud with a predictable storyline, boring script and poor performances.

The director's decision to cast Sabyasachi Chakraborty as the cop and Rajatava Dutta as Nandini's abusive husband might have worked in favour of the film. Rajatava as usual steals every scene he is in. His short role is the only thing that is marginally watchable in this film. Sabyasachi generally plays cop-cum-sleuth roles very well. Here too he tries his best, but the romantic overtone of his character takes the necessary edge off. However, casting Jaya Seal Ghosh as one of the protagonists is a bad decision on the director's part. Someone who can't speak Bengali in a proper way can't make the audience watch and appreciate her acting. You will be distracted by her inaccurate pronunciations too often to concentrate on her performance.

Mumtaz Sorcar has done a decent enough job, in the sense that she doesn't look awkward as a schoolgirl and carries off the role of a corporate woman with the same ease. But, someone must have said that her smile is winsome, so she tries to insert a smiling face in almost every scene, whether needed or not. That is a bit disturbing. Soumitra Chatterjee has a cameo, in which he belts out a huge monologue that effective put the audience to sleep. And the less is said about the actors who play Raj and Vikram the better. All in all, instead of being the jack of all trades, the director should have hired someone to write the story and the script. We sincerely hope he remembers that before he makes another film.
{[['']]}
 
Support : Creating Website | Ripan Template | Ripan Template
Copyright © 2011. Download Latest Bangla Movies - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Ripan Das
Proudly powered by eBizToppers